home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newshub.cts.com!usenet
- From: pwright@crash.cts.com (Phil Wright)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: ZIP vs SyQuest
- Date: 15 Jan 1996 05:31:04 GMT
- Organization: CTS Network Services
- Message-ID: <3251.6587T1176T2787@crash.cts.com>
- References: <4bq8mg$gp2@guava.epix.net> <4ckqnj$3pv@zipper.zip.com.au> <4d7jmd$jn2@guava.epix.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gargoyle.cts.com
-
- On 13-Jan-96 11:32:45, William Near was reported to have said:
- >On 12 Jan 1996 00:30:56 GMT, Phil Wright articulated:
-
- re: price of cartridges
-
- Given that the 270MB SyQuests sell for almost three times the price of the
- 135MB cartridge, you have to wonder if SyQuest is making any money at
- all on the 135s or have they just been gouging the owners of the 270s?
-
- In any case the point I was making in the previous article is that on a
- pennies/mb basis there isn't much difference.
-
- >> The Zip disks are nice and small and very rugged.
-
- >Have you compared a ZIP disk's size to a SyQuest EZ135
- >cartridge lately? The size difference is negligable.
-
- True. The difference between the overall size of the carts
- isn't much but I carry mine around in their little audio
- cassette style cases. The EZ135 cartridge cases are these
- bulky, ugly things. The Zip disk, in its case, fits easily
- in a shirt or jacket pocket. The EZ135 case, if it fits,
- makes an unsightly bulge. They also take up more shelf
- space.
-
- >I'll agree that the platters used in the SyQuest's
- >cartridges may be more fragile than the ZIP's disks. I'm
- >neither careless nor abusive with my computer equipment,
- >though.
-
- Same here but accidents happen and I'll put my money on a
- Zip cartridge being readable after an accident.
-
- >>The SyQuest disks have bulky, clumsy cases and, well, you'll probably
- >>need that 5 year warranty.
-
- >Unfounded.
-
- Every SyQuest user I know has had at least one cartridge die on them.
- (Older 44, 88, 105, 200 or 270 MB style units. Don't know anyone,
- personally, that has a EZ135. So far, everyone I know that has been
- tempted by the dark side of removables has been safely brought back into
- the light.)
-
- >The cases are no more clumsy than a CD-ROM's case
- >is. Pop it open -- pop it closed.
-
- They are huge and clumsy.
-
- ><> Zip disks can be ejected with a simple push of a button and come out
- ><> immediately. The SyQuest can't and doesn't.
-
- >Yes, that extra speed does require spin up/down time.
- >About 5 seconds for each. Are you in that big of a hurry to
- >swap disks? :-)
-
- No but when I want to swap a disk, I just reach, push the button and the
- disk pops out. Negligible delay and there's no way I can pop it out before
- it's safe to do so.
-
- >How much swapping do you do with those ZIP disks?
-
- Quite a bit I guess. I do have over a dozen Zip disks. Some for backup,
- some just for offline storage, others as large temporary buffers.
- (I also have two 540MB HD's on my A3000 for general applications, a 2GB
- Barracuda for video stuff and a Jaz 1GB every now and then to move those
- really large files around.)
-
- At the user group meetings Zip disks are usually popping in and out of
- various peoples drives at a frantic pace!
-
- >Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to start a ZIP vs SyQuest
- >war, but after trying a ZIP drive for a day I decided to go
- >for the SyQuest after reading its specs. I don't regret the
- >choice.
-
- Me neither (to both the choice and the not trying to start a war).
- You presented the benefits of the EZ135 (while ignoring the negatives) and
- I am just presenting a more balanced view of the two drives. :-)
-
- Another cool but not particularly useful Zip feature: You can eject the
- disk under software control.
-
- Phil
-
- pwright@crash.cts.com
-
-